- 摘 要
-
王 宏1， 魏雷濤2， 丁永君3
（1 東北電力設(shè)計院，長春 130021；2 天津大學(xué)，天津 300072；3 天津大學(xué)建筑設(shè)計規(guī)劃研究總院，天津 300072）[摘要] 結(jié)合某實際框架．簡體結(jié)構(gòu)，運(yùn)用靜力彈塑性和彈塑性動力時程兩種方法，通過對實際工程進(jìn)行大震下的分析，比較了靜力彈塑性方法與彈塑性動力時程方法的異同，指出靜力彈塑性方法在框筒結(jié)構(gòu)分析中存在的問題，歸納出靜力彈塑性方法的優(yōu)點與不足，并對于結(jié)構(gòu)抗震性能進(jìn)行了整體評估，得到的一系列結(jié)論可供設(shè)計人員參考。
[關(guān)鍵詞] 靜力彈塑性；彈塑性動力時程；大震；高層框筒
中圖分類號： 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識碼：A 文章編號：1002-848X(2011) Sl-0104-04Application and analysis of static elastic-plastic method on the seismic design of high-rise frame-tube buildings
Wang Hong1, Wei Leitao2, Ding Yongjun3
(1 Northeast Electric Power Design Institute, Changchun 130021, China; 2 Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 3 Tianjin University Architecture Design & Research Institute, Tianjin 300072, China)Abstract: The difference between the static elastic-plastic analysis method and the elastic-plastic time-lustory analysis method was compared through the comparative analysis ofa real frame-tube structure under major earthquake. The problems of the elastic-plastic analyses method were pointed in the analysis of the frame-tube structures. The advantages and disadvantages of the elastic-plastic method were summarized. The seismic performance of the whole structures was evaluated. The results and conclusions can be referred by the structural design.
Keywords: static; elastic-plastic; elastic-plastic time-history; major earthquake; high-rise frame-tube
